Categories:

The Process of Resolving Anger

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaAvlu1bc-k

John McMullin, Holistic Coach, presents The Process of Resolving Anger. John explains that anger is a secondary emotion to shame, fear, and/or feeling out of control. Anger expressed outwardly towards others isn’t about another person; it’s about the relationship that we have with ourself about others. Listen how and why anger is expressed in a relationship, and how it can be an opportunity for intimacy.

Posted in General.


Ear Lobe Crease and Heart Disease

The body provides signs of disease if you know what to look for. Literature indicates that a diagonal creases in the ear lobe may provide a reliable warning sign of coronary heart disease. If this external indicator is present, more investigation into other coronary risk factors would be a good idea.

Diagonal ear lobe crease and coronary risk factors.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7365179

Ear lobe crease and coronary heart disease.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1473944

Ear lobe crease and coronary artery disease. 1,000 patients and review of the literature. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6359874

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , .


Fighting Fair – Reacting vs Responding

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwzT6ofS9fU

Do you know how to fight fair? Are you reacting or responding in your relationships? John McMullin of Journeys of Wisdom provides insight into how conflict can create intimacy between two people.

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Significance of Skin Tags

The presence of multiple skin tags are a major sign of impaired carbohydrate metabolism.

Int J Dermatol. 2007 Nov;46(11):1155-9.
Skin tag as a cutaneous marker for impaired carbohydrate metabolism: a case-control study.
Rasi A, Soltani-Arabshahi R, Shahbazi N.
BACKGROUND:
Skin tags are common benign skin tumors usually occurring on the neck and major flexors of older people. A possible association with impaired carbohydrate metabolism has been suggested in previous studies, but the results are not conclusive.
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate and compare the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in patients with skin tag and a control group.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
A case-control study was conducted in individuals over 15 years old, comparing cases (n = 104) with at least three skin tags and age-, sex-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls (n = 94) without skin tag. Cases and controls were recruited from patients consecutively seen at an academic outpatient dermatology clinic. All patients underwent a standard 2-h oral glucose tolerance test with 75 g glucose.
RESULTS:
Patients with skin tag had higher frequency of diabetes than the control group (23.07% vs. 8.51%, chi(2)-test, P = 0.005). The difference in the frequency of IGT was not significant (13.46% vs. 10.63%, chi(2)-test, P = 0.543). There was a positive correlation between the total number of skin tags and the mean fasting plasma glucose (Pearson correlation, r = 0.260, P = 0.031); patients with more than 30 skin tags were particularly at an increased risk of diabetes (52.0%). No correlation was found between the number of skin tags and BMI. We did not find any correlation between the anatomical localization of skin tags and impaired carbohydrate metabolism, except for skin tags under the breast in women.
CONCLUSION:
These results show an increased risk of diabetes mellitus in patients with multiple skin tags. With regard to the importance of early diagnosis of diabetes, we recommend a high level of suspicion for impaired carbohydrate metabolism in patients with skin tag.

An Bras Dermatol. 2010 Jan-Feb;85(1):25-31.
[Association between skin tags and insulin resistance].
[Article in Portuguese]
Tamega Ade A, Aranha AM, Guiotoku MM, Miot LD, Miot HA.
BACKGROUND:
Skin tags are dermatological lesions commonly found in the general population and have been associated with diabetes mellitus, obesity, insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. Early detection of patients with insulin resistance may play an important preventive role.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the association between skin tags in the neck or axillary regions and insulin resistance.
METHODS:
A cross-sectional study involving adult patients receiving care at a university teaching hospital. Cases were defined as patients with > 5 skin tags in the neck region and/or axillae. Insulin resistance was estimated using the HOMA-IR index. Results were adjusted for the other known covariates of risk for insulin resistance using a multiple logistic regression model.
RESULTS:
Ninety-eight cases and 103 controls were evaluated. There was no difference between the groups with respect to age or gender. Skin tags were directly associated with HOMA-IR values (odds ratio = 1.4), hypertriglyceridemia and body mass index, irrespective of adjustment for diabetes mellitus, age, skin phototype, gender, family history of diabetes mellitus or hip/waist ratio. Qualitatively elevated HOMA-IR levels (>3.8) were also significantly associated (odds ratio = 7.5).
CONCLUSIONS:
The presence of multiple skin tags was strongly associated with insulin resistance irrespective of other risk factors

Clin Exp Med. 2010 Sep;10(3):193-7. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
The metabolic profile in patients with skin tags.
Sari R, Akman A, Alpsoy E, Balci MK.
Although skin tags are associated with diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, hypertension, obesity, atherogenic lipid profile, no data in the literature show that the presence of skin tags is associated with serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein, uric acid, free fatty acid and leptin level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and obesity in patients with skin tags and to compare patients with skin tags and normal healthy subjects for insulin resistance, serum lipids, insulin, glucose, leptin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, free fatty acid levels. We evaluated 113 patients with skin tags and 31 healthy subjects. The two groups were compared with respect to BMI, lipid profile, blood pressure, insulin resistance, serum lipids, insulin, glucose, leptin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, free fatty acid and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Total 53.9 and 33.6% of patients with skin tags were overweight and obese, respectively. The frequency of hypertension 30.1%, dyslipidemia 59.3% and insulin resistance 21.2% were detected. HOMA-IR (P < 0.001) and serum glucose (P < 0.001), insulin (P = 0.002), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (P = 0.001), uric acid (P = 0.001), free fatty acid (P = 0.002), HbA1c (P < 0.001), total cholesterol (P = 0.018), LDL-cholesterol (P = 0.023), and triglyceride levels (P = 0.001) were higher in patients with skin tags than control group. Overweight and/or obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, insulin resistance and elevated high-sensitive C-reactive protein are seen in patients with skin tags. Skin tags may be a marker of increased risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008 Oct;6(10):852-5, 852-6. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
Screening of glucose/insulin metabolic alterations in men with multiple skin tags on the neck.
[Article in English, German]
Sudy E, Urbina F, Maliqueo M, Sir T.
SUMMARY: Multiple skin tags appear associated with abnormalities in glucose/insulin metabolism. Clinical and metabolic glucose/insulin characteristics of men with multiple (8 or more) skin tags on the neck were compared with a control group with few or none. Both groups were divided in two subgroups according to normal or abnormal laboratory findings. In the study subgroup with normal laboratory findings the number of skin tags varied from 8-33, whereas in those with abnormal laboratory findings the range was 9-65. Eight or more skin tags were related with statistically significant laboratory glucose/insulin abnormalities: basal hyperinsulinemia (p<0.002), postprandial hyperinsulinemia (p<0.003), and postprandial hyperglycemia (p<0.01). In the multiple skin tag group 77 % had diverse laboratory abnormalities, including insulin resistance, basal hyperinsulinemia, postprandial hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance or type 2 diabetes, in contrast with the control group, where only 33% showed laboratory abnormalities. One-third of the study group had acanthosis nigricans. Only 15 % of patients with metabolic abnormalities did not show any cutaneous expression of glucose/insulin alterations (9 or more skin tags on the neck, acanthosis nigricans, or waist circumference greater than 95 cm). Multiple skin tags were more sensitive than acanthosis nigricans in identifying those with alterations in the glucose/insulin metabolism (77 vs. 32 % respectively), although less specific (68 vs.100%). Multiple skin tags should raise suspicion of insulin resistance or hyperinsulinemia.

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .


Belly Fat, Cortisol, and Stress

Also see:
The Streaming Organism
Stress, Portrait of a Killer – Full Documentary (2008)
Stress and Aging: The Glucocorticoid Cascade Hypothesis

“In experiments, progesterone was found to be the basic hormone of adaptation and of resistance to stress. The adrenal glands use it to produce their anti-stress hormones, and when there is enough progesterone, they don’t have to produce the potentially harmful cortisone. In a progesterone deficiency, we produce too much cortisone, and excessive cortisone causes osteoporosis, aging of the skin, damage to brain cells, and the accumulation of fat, especially on the back and abdomen.” – Ray Peat, PhD

“I think fat develops around the abdominal organs during stress as a defensive measure, similar to the padding effect that you mention, for walking, sitting, and moving. Around joints, fat pads fill in spaces between tendons, muscles, and bones. When stress becomes too generalized, for example when we live in a toxic environment and eat toxic foods, that produce inflammation, then fat deposition can lose its simple mechanical function, and, especially when the stored fat is highly unsaturated, it can become an internal source of inflammation and toxicity. The polyunsaturated fats that contribute to inappropriate fat storage, producing prostaglandins and toxic free radicals, also interfere with good muscle development, and eventually lead to the sarcopenia of aging, in which the body’s muscle content shrinks as the fat content increases. A good layer of abdominal muscle, subtly padded by fat, produces the most attractive body contour.” – Ray Peat PhD

“Fat does not provide substantial quantities of carbohydrate, but some of the latter is needed to maintain body functions. If it is not in the diet, then body protein catabolism will be accelerated for gluconeogenesis. In some individuals, sufficient protein destruction will result to provide glucose for synthesis of substantial quantities of new body fat.” -Constance Martin, PhD

The location of fat stores can provide feedback regarding hormonal regulation. The stress hormone, cortisol, is linked to the accumulation of belly fat.

Psychosom Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;62(5):623-32.
Stress and body shape: stress-induced cortisol secretion is consistently greater among women with central fat.
Epel ES, McEwen B, Seeman T, Matthews K, Castellazzo G, Brownell KD, Bell J, Ickovics JR.
OBJECTIVE:
Excessive central fat puts one at greater risk of disease. In animal studies, stress-induced cortisol secretion has been shown to increase central fat. The objective of this study was to assess whether women with central fat distribution (as indicated by a high waist-to-hip ratio [WHR]), across a range of body mass indexes, display consistently heightened cortisol reactivity to repeated laboratory stressors.
METHODS:
Fifty-nine healthy premenopausal women, 30 with a high WHR and 29 with a low WHR, were exposed to consecutive laboratory sessions over 4 days (three stress sessions and one rest session). During these sessions, cortisol and psychological responses were assessed.
RESULTS:
Women with a high WHR evaluated the laboratory challenges as more threatening, performed more poorly on them, and reported more chronic stress. These women secreted significantly more cortisol during the first stress session than women with a low WHR. Furthermore, lean women with a high WHR lacked habituation to stress in that they continued to secrete significantly more cortisol in response to now familiar challenges (days 2 and 3) than lean women with a low WHR.
CONCLUSIONS:
Central fat distribution is related to greater psychological vulnerability to stress and cortisol reactivity. This may be especially true among lean women, who did not habituate to repeated stress. The current cross-sectional findings support the hypothesis that stress-induced cortisol secretion may contribute to central fat and demonstrate a link between psychological stress and risk for disease.

Obes Res. 1999 Jan;7(1):9-15.
Stress-induced cortisol, mood, and fat distribution in men.
Epel EE, Moyer AE, Martin CD, Macary S, Cummings N, Rodin J, Rebuffe-Scrive M.
OBJECTIVE:
A previous study in our laboratory (Moyer et al., Obes Res. 1994;2:255-62 found that, in response to uncontrollable laboratory stress, women with a high waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) had higher cortisol reactivity, poorer coping skills, and lower anger responses than women with low WHR. We aimed to compare high WHR men’s stress responses to these women.
RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES:
The current study examined cortisol reactivity and psychological data of 27 healthy high WHR men exposed to the same laboratory challenges as the women from our previous study. Men’s data are discussed in relation to that of the high and low WHR women.
RESULTS:
Men responded to the stress with increases in both cortisol and blood pressure. In comparison with the high and low WHR women, men had significantly higher total cortisol on the stress day. However, when comparing a sub-sample of men and women matched in WHR’s, differences in cortisol secretion were greatly diminished and no longer significant. In addition, men had higher desire for control than both high and low WHR women, and lower mood reactivity than low WHR women. Despite the lower mood reactivity of high WHR groups, the high mood reactors among the high WHR women, and to a lesser extent, men, tended to have higher cortisol reactivity.
DISCUSSION:
These results suggest that the psychological differences and greater exposure to cortisol observed among the high WHR men and women may have played a role in contributing to their greater abdominal fat depots.

Obes Res. 1994 May;2(3):255-62.
Stress-induced cortisol response and fat distribution in women.
Moyer AE, Rodin J, Grilo CM, Cummings N, Larson LM, Rebuffé-Scrive M.
Recent studies have shown an association between uncontrollable stress and abdominal fat distribution. It has been suggested that changes in cortisol secretion might represent one possible mechanism for this relationship. This study investigated whether body fat distribution, determined by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), is related to salivary cortisol levels in response to laboratory stressors. Subjects were 41 overweight women with a Low or a High WHR. Multiple measures of cortisol and mood were obtained during a session of stressful tasks (eg., timed arithmetic) and during a time-matched, control rest session. Also, background life stress and psychological trait variables were assessed. Compared to Low WHR subjects, High WHR subjects secreted significantly more cortisol during the stressful session after 60 minutes of stress, and considering the total area under the curve of secretion. This difference was not seen on the rest day. In terms of background and psychological measures, High WHR subjects were characterized by poorer coping skills and differences in mood reactivity. Specifically, although all subjects became more angry in response to the stressful session, High WHR subjects showed smaller increases in anger. This could indicate that they are more likely to evidence a helpless reaction to uncontrollable stress. These findings support the hypothesis that cortisol secretion might represent a mechanism for the observed association between stress and abdominal fat distribution. Furthermore, differences in coping and appraisal may suggest that a particular psychological pattern might influence the reactivity of the adrenal-cortical system to stress, and subsequent fat distribution.

Psychosom Med. 2010 May;72(4):357-64. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
Low calorie dieting increases cortisol.
Tomiyama AJ, Mann T, Vinas D, Hunger JM, Dejager J, Taylor SE.
OBJECTIVE:
To test the hypothesis that dieting, or the restriction of caloric intake, is ineffective because it increases chronic psychological stress and cortisol production–two factors that are known to cause weight gain; and to examine the respective roles of the two main behaviors that comprise dieting–monitoring one’s caloric intake and restricting one’s caloric intake–on psychological and biological stress indicators.
METHODS:
In a 2 (monitoring vs. not) x 2 (restricting vs. not) fully crossed, controlled experiment, 121 female participants were assigned randomly to one of four dietary interventions for 3 weeks. The monitoring + restricting condition tracked their caloric intake and restricted their caloric intake (1200 kcal/day); the monitoring only condition tracked their caloric intake but ate normally; the restricting only condition was provided 1200 kcal/day of food but did not track their calories, and the control group ate normally and did not track their intake. Before and after the interventions, participants completed measures of perceived stress and 2 days of diurnal saliva sampling to test for cortisol.
RESULTS:
Restricting calories increased the total output of cortisol, and monitoring calories increased perceived stress.
CONCLUSIONS:
Dieting may be deleterious to psychological well-being and biological functioning, and changes in clinical recommendations may be in order.

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Nov;293(5):R1864-74. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
Social stress and recovery: implications for body weight and body composition.
Tamashiro KL, Nguyen MM, Ostrander MM, Gardner SR, Ma LY, Woods SC, Sakai RR.
Social stress resulting from dominant-subordinate relationships is associated with body weight loss and altered body composition in subordinate (SUB) male rats. Here, we extend these findings to determine whether stress-induced changes in energy homeostasis persist when the social stress is removed, and the animal is allowed to recover. We examined body weight (BW), body composition, and relevant endocrine measures after one or two cycles of 14 days of social stress, each followed by 21 days of recovery in each rat’s individual home cage. SUB lost significantly more BW during social housing in a visible burrow system (VBS) compared with dominant (DOM) animals. Weight loss during social stress was attributable to a decrease in adipose tissue in DOM and SUB, with an additional loss of lean tissue in SUB. During both 21-day recovery periods, DOM and SUB regained lost BW, but only SUB were hyperphagic. Following recovery, SUB had a relatively larger increase in adipose tissue and plasma leptin compared with DOM, indicating that body composition changes were dependent on social status. Control animals that were weight matched to SUB or male rats exposed to the VBS environment without females, and that did not form a social hierarchy, did not exhibit changes in body composition like SUB in the VBS. Therefore, chronic social stress causes social status-dependent changes in BW, composition and endocrine measures that persist after repeated stress and recovery cycles and that may ultimately lead to metabolic disorders and obesity.

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep 2. pii: S0306-4530(13)00287-4. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.07.022. [Epub ahead of print]
Psychosocial stress induces hyperphagia and exacerbates diet-induced insulin resistance and the manifestations of the Metabolic Syndrome.
Sanghez V, Razzoli M, Carobbio S, Campbell M, McCallum J, Cero C, Ceresini G, Cabassi A, Govoni P, Franceschini P, de Santis V, Gurney A, Ninkovic I, Parmigiani S, Palanza P, Vidal-Puig A, Bartolomucci A.
Stress and hypercaloric food are recognized risk factors for obesity, Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Given the complexity of these metabolic processes and the unavailability of animal models, there is poor understanding of their underlying mechanisms. We established a model of chronic psychosocial stress in which subordinate mice are vulnerable to weight gain while dominant mice are resilient. Subordinate mice fed a standard diet showed marked hyperphagia, high leptin, low adiponectin, and dyslipidemia. Despite these molecular signatures of MetS and T2D, subordinate mice fed a standard diet were still euglycemic. We hypothesized that stress predisposes subordinate mice to develop T2D when synergizing with other risk factors. High fat diet aggravated dyslipidemia and the MetS thus causing a pre-diabetes-like state in subordinate mice. Contrary to subordinates, dominant mice were fully protected from stress-induced metabolic disorders when fed both a standard- and a high fat-diet. Dominant mice showed a hyperphagic response that was similar to subordinate but, unlike subordinates, showed a significant increase in VO2, VCO2, and respiratory exchange ratio when compared to control mice. Overall, we demonstrated a robust stress- and social status-dependent effect on the development of MetS and T2D and provided insights on the physiological mechanisms. Our results are reminiscent of the effect of the individual socioeconomic status on human health and provide an animal model to study the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


A Common Finding – Altered Breathing Patterns

Also see:
Adverse Effects of Mouth Breathing
Hyperventilation and Breathe-More Myth
GOOD BREATHING, BAD BREATHING
Carbon Dioxide Basics
Protective Altitude
Chronic hyperventilation; have you got it, what is it, and how do you fix it?
Phospholipases, PUFA, and Inflammation
Estrogen’s Role in Asthma
Unsaturated Fats and Lung Function
Bohr Effect and Cells O2 Levels: Healthy vs. Sick People

Respiration is at the top of the health hierarchy; if you stop breathing, you die. Deviation from normal respiratory function signals a shift away from homeostasis (a state of balance) in the body.

Upon initial assessment, most of my clients come to me with altered respiratory function which I call inverted respiration or chest breathing. Chest breathing is characterized by inhalation that expands the chest and shrinks the abdomen and exhalation that shrinks the chest and expands the abdomen. In this scenario, the individual has defaulted to an auxiliary, faulty respiratory pattern which does not utilize the (thoracic) diaphragm, our major respiratory muscle.

Proper respiratory function uses the diaphragm. During diaphragmatic breathing, upon inhalation the stomach expands as the diaphragm contracts and the chest may expand only during the last third of a deep breath. Upon exhalation the diaphragm relaxes and the stomach gets smaller. Inhalation and exhalation is done through the nose.

Inverted respiration can occur due to poor posture of the head/neck/shoulder complex (upper cross syndrome). Respiratory dysfunction can lead to overuse of auxiliary respiratory muscles, carbon dioxide deficiency, fatigue, lactic acid production, low energy, poor sleep, abdominal wall dysfunction, chronic fatigue, low energy, visceral dysfunction, GI problems, constipation, back pain, decreased performance, and pain syndromes.

Self Test:
Do the following self test lying on your back (supine), seated, and standing.

1. Place hands over stomach.
2. Breathe “normally” and take five breaths through the nose only.
3. Observe what the stomach and chest do during respiration.

You may have different respiratory function depending upon whether you are supine, seated, or standing. You should use the diaphragm irregardless of body positioning. Do you have inverted respiration in any of those postures?


Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , .


Proton pump inhibitors and Hip Fracture

Proton pump inhibitors (Prevacid, Nexium, Prilosec), commonly given to those with acid reflux, significantly increase chance of hip fractures when taken long term.

JAMA. 2006;296(24):2947-2953. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.24.2947
Long-term Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy and Risk of Hip Fracture
Yu-Xiao Yang, MD, MSCE; James D. Lewis, MD, MSCE; Solomon Epstein, MD; David C. Metz, MD
Results There were 13 556 hip fracture cases and 135 386 controls. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for hip fracture associated with more than 1 year of PPI therapy was 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.59). The risk of hip fracture was significantly increased among patients prescribed long-term high-dose PPIs (AOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.80-3.90; P<.001). The strength of the association increased with increasing duration of PPI therapy (AOR for 1 year, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.15-1.30]; 2 years, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.28-1.56]; 3 years, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.37-1.73]; and 4 years, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.39-1.80]; P<.001 for all comparisons). Conclusion Long-term PPI therapy, particularly at high doses, is associated with an increased risk of hip fracture.

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , .


Smoking Tooth – Mercury Fillings

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ylnQ-T7oiA

Any mercury in your mouth is too much mercury!

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Is your gut flora making you FAT?

The foundation of health lies in the gut. What you put in your mouth and how your GI tract is functioning has a dramatic effect on your well being. Adequate amounts of different species of gut flora are needed to maintain the health and function of the GI tract and the immune system. Would you believe that your gut flora also has a say in whether you’re learn or overweight? Multiple studies indicate that the ratio of levels of the two major groups of bugs in the GI tract, Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes, decide whether you are more likely to be lean or overweight.

Experiments done with mice clearly support this phenomenon. Certain populations of gut flora made mice fat and when these populations of microbiota were introduced into mice that were previously lean, they too became fat! This is a fascinating finding! The guts of the lean mice had a dominant amount of a group of bacteria called Bacteroidetes while the guts of the genetically fat mice were dominated by a group called Firmicutes. Firmicutes are the “fat bugs” and Bacteroidetes are the “skinny bugs.” Additionally, as weight loss occurs, a shift from Firmicutes populations to Bacteroidetes populations was found.

The evidence shows that the Firmicutes populations extract more calories from food than do the Bacteroidetes and play a role in fat storage. Discovering the ratio between these two populations of gut flora may be beneficial in identifying blocking factors in fat loss. Lowering your percentage of “fat bugs” relative to the percentage of “skinny bug” may assist in weight control.

The Metametrix 2100 comprehensive stool analysis includes a section titled Adiposity Index which looks directly at the levels of both Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes flora populations.

Photobucket

Adiposity Index from Metametrix Stool Analysis

Finding cause for and addressing all GI abnormalities found on the test in addition to manipulating the ratio between skinny bugs and fat bugs can drastically improve the likelihood fat loss success. Make no mistake that what you’re putting into your mouth plays a role in what predominate species of bacteria resides in your GI tract. When flora get out of balance due to stress and improper nutrition and lifestyle, the body becomes susceptible to all sorts of diseases including obesity. If you’re fat loss has stalled, consider taking a look into the health of the GI tract to see what’s going on!

Resources
(1)http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7122/abs/4441022a.html
(2)http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7122/abs/nature05414.html
(3) http://www.pnas.org/content/104/3/979.long
(4) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17183309?dopt=Abstract
(5)http://www.pnas.org/content/101/44/15718.long

Posted in General.


World According to Monsanto

On March 11 a new documentary was aired on French television – a documentary that Americans won’t ever see. The gigantic bio-tech corporation Monsanto is threatening to destroy the agricultural biodiversity which has served mankind for thousands of years.

If you care about the future of the food supply, your health, and the health of the planet, I’d suggest watching this from start to finish. The lengths that Monsanto goes to force its agenda on the world are astounding.

Posted in General.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , .